Asset based lending vs Invoice finance
Invoice finance funds one asset. Asset based lending funds several at once inside a single structure. Bigger is not automatically better, because the wider facility brings a materially heavier reporting and diligence burden.
| Criterion | Asset based lending | Invoice finance |
|---|---|---|
| Collateral | Receivables, stock, plant and property | Receivables only |
| Typical facility size | Larger, usually from a few million upward | From modest ledgers upward |
| Set up time | Six to twelve weeks | One to three weeks |
| Reporting | Monthly borrowing base plus periodic field audit | Ledger reconciliation |
| Cost | Blended, lower on the larger secured element | Service fee plus discount charge |
| Covenants | Present, tied to the borrowing base | Light or none |
If the cash gap is created purely by customer payment terms, a receivables facility solves it with the least friction. It goes live quickly, requires no valuation of anything else and leaves your other assets unencumbered for future funding.
For service businesses, agencies, wholesalers and staffing companies with no meaningful stock or plant, there is usually nothing an asset based structure would add.
Manufacturers, distributors and importers hold value in raw materials, finished goods and machinery as well as invoices. Funding only the invoices leaves most of the balance sheet doing nothing. A combined facility releases the lot under one agreement and one security package.
It is also the right structure for acquisitions and turnarounds, where the quantum needed exceeds what the ledger alone supports.
Asset based lenders require monthly borrowing base certificates and periodic field examinations, which means real finance function capacity. Businesses without that capacity find the reporting burden punishing, and a covenant breach caused by late reporting is still a breach.
Set up also takes longer and costs more in valuation and legal fees. If the requirement is urgent, receivables funding first and a wider facility later is often the sensible sequence.
Take invoice finance for speed, simplicity and a receivables driven gap. Move to asset based lending when stock and plant hold significant value, the amount needed exceeds ledger capacity, and your finance function can carry the reporting.
Yes, and it is a common path. The receivables facility is usually refinanced into the wider structure.
Asset based lending is normally cheaper on a blended basis at scale, but only once the larger secured elements are drawn.
Asset based lending always does. Invoice finance usually takes security over the receivables and often a debenture too.
Not sure which route fits? Describe the requirement once and we will structure it and approach the providers whose criteria match. No upfront fees — charges are due only once funding is in place.
Start a funding request